Need some advice?
Leave your details and we will get in touch.
Contact an expertLet me start off by saying that I am an advocate of Building Information Modeling (B.I.M.) and its benefits to the construction industry, but I have not whole-heartedly embraced current B.I.M. software as the standard tool of architectural design. However, there is a large population of design professionals, facilities managers, project managers, and building owners who have already embraced it.
They understand that the software is a real game-changer; a tool that can make the design and construction process more efficient and rewarding. B.I.M. offers many solutions to some of the traditional problems associated with coordinating complex design projects, and offers post-occupancy tools and cost savings never before seen by building owners. However, its shortcomings leave many wishing for more:
These are just a few of the B.I.M. criticisms and realities that I have heard from others in the profession. I believe that these criticisms are necessary to help grow and make our industry better. B.I.M. is a powerful information-sharing tool, but it should be better guided by the design process that it serves.
The GSA and many municipalities now require that B.I.M. software be utilized by design firms on any new construction project with public funding. LEED certification rewards projects that use B.I.M. so it is clear that the future of building design is with B.I.M., and it is important that design professionals unhappy with the shortcomings noted above demand more.
The relationship of technology, design, and ownership needs must become more aligned with, and inform, one another. That is the perfect sustainable system; one that the future of B.I.M. must address more equally.
By Steven A. Watchorn, Assoc. A.I.A., LEED AP
Get the latest updates about SOCOTEC, subscribe to our newsletter!
Add new comment